On 9/20/07, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > Yes it is intentional. It is an extension of an already existing
> > error with non templates. The code is invalid, though the C++
> > standard does make a mention, this does not have to be diagnostic.
>
>
Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Yes it is intentional. It is an extension of an already existing
> error with non templates. The code is invalid, though the C++
> standard does make a mention, this does not have to be diagnostic.
Thanks for the quick reply! This is great, I like the change since it
enfor
On 9/20/07, Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Compilation works with *many* other compilers incl. all older, released g++,
> Visual C++, and EDG-based compilers.
And that does not make the code valid.
> I spent some time with Google and also looked here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/g
I'm testing our C++ code with
g++ (GCC) 4.3.0 20070919 (experimental)
That's SVN revision 128608, gcc_trunk.
I'm getting many errors like this:
% g++ -c changes_meaning.cpp
changes_meaning.cpp:8: error: declaration of 'typedef struct ns::foo
ns::bar::foo'
changes_meaning.cpp:4: error: changes mea
