On Friday 15 December 2006 22:30, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote:
> Hi
>
> > What are the standard practices with installing multiple versions of gcc
> > on a system. I renamed this gcc to be gcc-4.1. However, it looks like it
> > will still overwrite some files when I do 'make install'. Is this true?
>
On Friday 15 December 2006 22:30, Ferad Zyulkyarov wrote:
> Hi
>
> > What are the standard practices with installing multiple versions of gcc
> > on a system. I renamed this gcc to be gcc-4.1. However, it looks like it
> > will still overwrite some files when I do 'make install'. Is this true?
>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:35:23PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Bob Rossi wrote:
>
> > Since i've used a prefix, I'm assumming gcc wants to be installed where
> > I told it to be. I'm wondering 2 things.
>
> It's not supposed to be that way. The toolchain is supposed to be
> relocatable for Min
Hi
What are the standard practices with installing multiple versions of gcc
on a system. I renamed this gcc to be gcc-4.1. However, it looks like it
will still overwrite some files when I do 'make install'. Is this true?
As far as I know, "make install" does not overwrite any files if there
is
Bob Rossi wrote:
> Since i've used a prefix, I'm assumming gcc wants to be installed where
> I told it to be. I'm wondering 2 things.
It's not supposed to be that way. The toolchain is supposed to be
relocatable for MinGW targets. I don't know if it currently is, but
read the past threads on th
Hi,
I've compiled g++ for mingw with,
../gcc-4.1.1/configure --prefix=/home/bobbybrasko/g++/prefixdir --host=mingw32 \
--target=mingw32 --program-prefix="" \
--program-suffix="-4.1" --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as
--enable-threads --disable-nls \
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-w
