On 20 Dec 2008, at 03:51, Mike Stump wrote:
Yes, libgcc_s is carefully built with carefully controlled exports.
They are controlled by:
gcc/libgcc-std.ver
when someone wants to export one of the symbols, they can just add
it to the list.
OK, my question was phrased poorly;
I understa
On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Could you comment on...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-12/msg00310.html
Is there some specific reason it's done this way?
Yes, libgcc_s is carefully built with carefully controlled exports.
They are controlled by:
gcc/libgcc-std.ver
wh
Hi,
I've noticed that there are a few symbols that appear " T " from
libgcc.a and " t " from libgcc_s.1.dylib.
(the exact set depends on ppc/intel and 32/64)
for example, on darwin9 (32 bit libs) the following;
___copysigntf3
___fabstf2
___udiv_w_sdiv
___unordtf2
Is there some specific reaso
