Re: Where can I get copyright assignment/disclaimer forms for contribution to gcc ?

2017-09-08 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 8 September 2017 at 11:10, lhmouse wrote: > Dear GCC developers, > > I have created a patch for enabling diagnostic colors on Windows. In order to > allow the patch to be integrate with GCC, I need the copyright > assignment/disclaimer forms, according to >

Where can I get copyright assignment/disclaimer forms for contribution to gcc ?

2017-09-08 Thread lhmouse
Dear GCC developers, I have created a patch for enabling diagnostic colors on Windows. In order to allow the patch to be integrate with GCC, I need the copyright assignment/disclaimer forms, according to . Our MinGW target maintainer, jon_y, is also interes

Re: Request for clarification on how a contribution to gcc can be made

2010-12-13 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Thomas Klein writes: > To me it looks like that what is described in the online document > is either not correct or is > being misinterpreted at least by me. > It's not clear to me at which point the FSF is trusting an individual > (or organization or company

Re: Request for clarification on how a contribution to gcc can be made

2010-12-13 Thread Robert Dewar
On 12/13/2010 12:57 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote: On 12/13/2010 07:27 PM, Thomas Klein wrote: It's not clear to me at which point the FSF is trusting an individual (or organization or company) and why it is mistrusting an individual per default. My understanding is that the FSF wants to own the cod

Re: Request for clarification on how a contribution to gcc can be made

2010-12-13 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 12/13/2010 07:27 PM, Thomas Klein wrote: It's not clear to me at which point the FSF is trusting an individual (or organization or company) and why it is mistrusting an individual per default. My understanding is that the FSF wants to own the code completely,* which allows it to re-license

Request for clarification on how a contribution to gcc can be made

2010-12-13 Thread Thomas Klein
Hello To me it looks like that what is described in the online document is either not correct or is being misinterpreted at least by me. It's not clear to me at which point the FSF is trusting an individual (or organization or company) and why it is mistru

Re: contribution to gcc

2005-10-17 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Ganesh Bikshandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a fairly decent knowledge about compiler internals, object > oriented programming and algorithms. I would like to make a > non-trivial contribution to gcc/g++. I am interested in adding a new > optimization phase or impro

contribution to gcc

2005-10-17 Thread Ganesh Bikshandi
Hi, I have a fairly decent knowledge about compiler internals, object oriented programming and algorithms. I would like to make a non-trivial contribution to gcc/g++. I am interested in adding a new optimization phase or improving some existing ones or write stuff related to OO program