committed in revision 187494.
thanks.
On 05/14/2012 08:05 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck writes:
Should i change the section 16.9 doc to indicate that this pattern is
only to be used if the machine can do this with a single rounding?
Sure.
Ian
Kenneth Zadeck writes:
> Should i change the section 16.9 doc to indicate that this pattern is
> only to be used if the machine can do this with a single rounding?
Sure.
Ian
Section 16.9 of the current gcc doc is as follows. It implies that the
fma pattern should/could be used on a machine that double rounds the
multiply add.
`fmam4'
Multiply operand 2 and operand 1, then add operand 3, storing the
result in operand 0. All operands must have mode m. This pa
