On its' way. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> It is 4325 lines, should I ju
> It is 4325 lines, should I just email it to you instead
> of the whole group?
Yes, compressed.
--
Eric Botcazou
gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
> SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
> and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks!
Could you post the config.log file of the target libiberty?
--
Eric Botcazou
> Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
> SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
> and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks!
Could you post the config.log file of the target libiberty?
--
Eric Botcazou
: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
configure shell: /bin/sh
gnu make: GNU Make 3.80
Although I had #!/bin/sh at the beginning, it was taking my
SHELL as tcsh. I have stuck in (via notes) SHELL=/bin/ksh;export SHELL
and I am rebuilding it right now. Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> I put:
>
> printenv CC
> echo $CC
> which cc
>
> in the script and only got output for the which cmd as
> /opt
> I put:
>
> printenv CC
> echo $CC
> which cc
>
> in the script and only got output for the which cmd as
> /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc. I even reran the script with CC not set, just to make
> sure. Thanks!
Hum... let's try the basic checks then:
- what is your configure shell?
- what is your version of
: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> Ok, here is my script (note I am in a directory with only the
> script below when I execute the script below):
>
> CC=cc /export/home/src/net/gnu/gcc-4.0.2/confi
> Ok, here is my script (note I am in a directory with only the
> script below when I execute the script below):
>
> CC=cc /export/home/src/net/gnu/gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap>make_err 2>&1
>
> I get the exact same errors (at least as far as I see).
The target libiberty is not supposed t
Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 4:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> CC to cc only. So, now the script is:
>
> CC=cc
> export CC
> ../gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap
Do not export CC and do
> CC to cc only. So, now the script is:
>
> CC=cc
> export CC
> ../gcc-4.0.2/configure
> gmake bootstrap
Do not export CC and do not use a relative path:
CC=cc $absolute_path/configure ...
> Also, the ask why I was using the flags I was. The only reference I found
> to sparc where the sparcv9-*-s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Botcazou
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 6:06 PM
To: Joe Buck
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Douglas B. Jones
Subject: Re: compiling gcc-4.0.2 on solaris 9
> Although the compiler's executable is composed of 32-bit code, it can
> generate 32 or 64 bit code, whic
> Although the compiler's executable is composed of 32-bit code, it can
> generate 32 or 64 bit code, which is what I meant by "both compilers".
Ah! Indeed, but you're going to further confuse the readers. :-)
I think the best terminology is "32-bit multilib compiler" for
sparc-sun-solaris and
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:35:28PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Also, sparc-sun-solaris2.9 doesn't mean "32-bit compiler", it means
> > "build both compilers, defaulting to 32 bits".
>
> No, the compiler is purely 32-bit, only the libraries are of both flavors.
We are using the term in a diffe
> Also, sparc-sun-solaris2.9 doesn't mean "32-bit compiler", it means
> "build both compilers, defaulting to 32 bits".
No, the compiler is purely 32-bit, only the libraries are of both flavors.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:17:11PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > > mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
> > > CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
> > > export CC
> >
> > Why are you choosing those flags?
>
> Probably because they are advertised on:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
>
> > mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
> > CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
> > export CC
>
> Why are you choosing those flags?
Probably because they are advertised on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
> Just do CC=cc, you will get both a 32-bit and a 64-bit compiler. What
> seems
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 01:48:57PM -0500, Douglas B. Jones wrote:
> I am on:
>
> SunOS hostname 5.9 Generic_118558-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1500.
> I try to do a bootstrap with the following using gnu make 3.80:
>
> mkdir objectdir;cd objectdir
> CC="cc -xildoff -xarch=v9"
> export CC
Why a
(NOTE: I originally posted this to gcc-help, but only got
one response that the sender said they had posted a similar
posting a while back and got no responses. So, I am reposting
the below to gcc in hopes that this might be a better place
to post this question.)
I am on:
SunOS hostname 5.9 Gene
19 matches
Mail list logo
