On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:48:35AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> OK, I will revert the patch immediatelly, under assumption that your
> mail grants RM approval for 4.6 branch.
Yes, the reversion is fine.
Jakub
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
Well, at least with my cross it does.
this change, or something like it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into t
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>>> Well, at least with my cross it does.
>>>
>>> this change, or something like it:
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
>> Well, at least with my cross it does.
>>
>> this change, or something like it:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
>>
>> introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into the 4.6 branch f
Thanks for the prompt and indeed helpful hint.
I'll comment the offending line out locally for now.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Peter Garbett
> wrote:
>> Well, at least with my cross it does.
>>
>> this change, or something like
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Peter Garbett
wrote:
> Well, at least with my cross it does.
>
> this change, or something like it:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
>
> introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into the 4.6 branch for
> fold-
Well, at least with my cross it does.
this change, or something like it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=09a77c2ea0b41fdff8820cbcbe41b35762db5c45
introduces a reference to TS_TYPED into the 4.6 branch for
fold-const.c, and it isnt defined,
or at least neither I nor my compiler c
