> You may have seen this warning from the memory consumption tester:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2008-05/msg00041.html
>
> ... related to the recent identifier GC patch.
>
> I looked into this a little. My theory is that this is an artifact of
> how the tester collects its data. I
> "Richard" == Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> For big testcases I actually see a consistend reduction in
Richard> peak overall memory usage (the number if you would look at
Richard> 'top'). For small testcases I can see both ups and downs,
Richard> probably because of c
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You may have seen this warning from the memory consumption tester:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2008-05/msg00041.html
>
> ... related to the recent identifier GC patch.
>
> I looked into this a little. My theory i
You may have seen this warning from the memory consumption tester:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2008-05/msg00041.html
... related to the recent identifier GC patch.
I looked into this a little. My theory is that this is an artifact of
how the tester collects its data. In particular I s
