;X::t2", making the constructor name "X::t2::t2()").
With posted FSF GDB HEAD fix (fixing another unrelated issue):
[patch] Fix printed anonymous struct name
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-09/msg00483.html
I think it would be enough to just put proper dec
On 03-05-2010 00:47 wuyin wrote:
struct T{
int n;
};
struct T1{
struct T;
} t;
t.n=1;
Please support this grammar.
I believe it _is_ currently supported with -fms-extensions.
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Unnamed-Fields.html
Regards,
--
Pedro Pedruzzi
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 22:47, wuyin wrote:
> Please support this grammar.
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/coo/
My advice is to use a language with proper abstraction facilities, like C++.
I find.
-fms-extentions
struct T{
int n;
};
struct T1{
struct T;
} t;
t.n=1;
Please support this grammar.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/coo/
