Re: adding nodes in a tree --after GIMPLIFICATION, before SSA

2006-04-19 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Apr 19, 2006, at 1:37 PM, sean yang wrote: Thanks a lot. Here I further have a question, which is about the GIMPLE grammar. Thanks for the help again: I looked at walk_stmt(), which is basically how I want to walk through the function body (&DECL_SAVED_TREE(fn) ). This seems like a

Re: adding nodes in a tree --after GIMPLIFICATION, before SSA

2006-04-19 Thread sean yang
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: sean yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: adding nodes in a tree --after GIMPLIFICATION, before SSA Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:51:07 -0700 On Apr 18, 2006, at 7:28 PM, sean yang wrote: I will appreciate your help. Thanks in advance. Let

Re: adding nodes in a tree --after GIMPLIFICATION, before SSA

2006-04-18 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Apr 18, 2006, at 7:28 PM, sean yang wrote: I will appreciate your help. Thanks in advance. Let me give a concrete example of what I want to do (Please understand I have other reasons to do this after gimplification, though the example shows that there is a much simpler way to achieve

adding nodes in a tree --after GIMPLIFICATION, before SSA

2006-04-18 Thread sean yang
I will appreciate your help. Thanks in advance. Let me give a concrete example of what I want to do (Please understand I have other reasons to do this after gimplification, though the example shows that there is a much simpler way to achieve this): in the example, I want to add a call of inst