On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> tree_log2 appears to be a general function, so I suppose the check for
> negative integers must be made in check_user_alignment. Will the
> following patch work? (Bootstrapped x86_64, all alignment tests pass).
This patch is OK, subject to full
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:13:13PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was looking at why gcc.dg/c1x-align-3.c (test for errors, line 15) is
> > failing for the AVR target, and I found that the test expects _Alignas
> > with -__IN
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at why gcc.dg/c1x-align-3.c (test for errors, line 15) is
> failing for the AVR target, and I found that the test expects _Alignas
> with -__INT_MAX__ - 1 to fail with a "too large" error.
It expects either an error eithe
Hi,
I was looking at why gcc.dg/c1x-align-3.c (test for errors, line 15) is
failing for the AVR target, and I found that the test expects _Alignas
with -__INT_MAX__ - 1 to fail with a "too large" error.
I looked at the code responsible for generating the error (c-common.c,
check_user_alignment) a
