Opps. I meant...
Index: vect-5.f90
===
--- vect-5.f90 (revision 117033)
+++ vect-5.f90 (working copy)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
stop
end
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 2 loops" 1 "vect" { xfail {
lp64
Dorit,
I only have access to Darwin PPC at -m64 and
x86_64. However I have only been directly testing
Darwin PPC at -m64 and relying on the gcc-testresults
mailing list archive for the rest of the architectures.
Perhaps someone else here can provide a dump file
generated by -fdump-tree-vect-det
>Does anyone know if the fact that the gfortran.dg
> test case vect/vect-5.f90 is now showing a XPASS on
> indicates a regression? All three dg-final options that
> are marked to fail at lp64 now pass.
>
> Running target unix/-m64
> XPASS: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times
Does anyone know if the fact that the gfortran.dg
test case vect/vect-5.f90 is now showing a XPASS on
indicates a regression? All three dg-final options that
are marked to fail at lp64 now pass.
Running target unix/-m64
XPASS: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-5.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 2 l
