On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:04:40PM +, Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've been working on an optimization for quite a bit of time and
> in an attempt to move it to GCC 12 I found that FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN
> no longer exists. I poked around in the archives and tried a Google
> search but fo
gnu.org
Subject: Re: What replaces FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN
[EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please
be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection
practices.]
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 2:05 PM Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
>
> Guys,
&
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 2:05 PM Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
> I've been working on an optimization for quite a bit of time and
> in an attempt to move it to GCC 12 I found that FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN
> no longer exists. I poked around in the archives and tried a Google
> search but found nothi
Guys,
I've been working on an optimization for quite a bit of time and
in an attempt to move it to GCC 12 I found that FOR_EACH_LOOP_FN
no longer exists. I poked around in the archives and tried a Google
search but found nothing on it.
It suited my needs and I'd hate to have to rewrite a bunch of
