On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> We can limit new testcases, which we backport to 4.3 branch, only
>> to those 4.4 regressions against 4.3 branch. They should always
>> pass on 4.3 branch by definition.
>
> There's nothing wrong with backporting testcas
H.J. Lu wrote:
> We can limit new testcases, which we backport to 4.3 branch, only
> to those 4.4 regressions against 4.3 branch. They should always
> pass on 4.3 branch by definition.
There's nothing wrong with backporting testcases to an older release
branch, but please make sure that they pas
On 1/18/09, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This 4.3 regression:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
> >
> > is caused by a backport, which also introduced a 4.3
> > regression:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/b
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This 4.3 regression:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
>
> is caused by a backport, which also introduced a 4.3
> regression:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36765
It uncovered a latent problem. Of cou
Hi,
This 4.3 regression:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
is caused by a backport, which also introduced a 4.3
regression:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36765
Since we didn't backport testcases to 4.3 branch, we
didn't notice 4.3 regression when the packport was
