On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:46:38PM -0800, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I noticed that for a simple testcase:
> int t;
> void abort (void);
>
> int f(int t, const int *a)
> {
> const int b[] = { 1, 2, 3};
> if (!t)
> return f(1, b);
> return b == a;
> }
Note that in the above function, called
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I think C99 does allows this optimization (at least according to the
> normative note 112) but C++ does not. I could not find anything in
I don't know what you mean by "normative note" ("In accordance with Part 3
of the ISO/IEC Directives, this forewo
I noticed that for a simple testcase:
int t;
void abort (void);
int f(int t, const int *a)
{
const int b[] = { 1, 2, 3};
if (!t)
return f(1, b);
return b == a;
}
int main(void)
{
if (f(0, 0))
abort ();
return 0;
}
--- CUT ---
That before 4.0 gives a different result from 4.0 and
