On November 13, 2015 2:35:41 PM GMT+01:00, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
wrote:
>
>On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:37:02PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On November 12, 2015 8:10:05 PM GMT+01:00, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> > When analyzing code size differences between a 4.9.x compile
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:37:02PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On November 12, 2015 8:10:05 PM GMT+01:00, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> > When analyzing code size differences between a 4.9.x compiler and
> > trunk for the AVR target, I found quite a few cases where extra
> >
On November 12, 2015 8:10:05 PM GMT+01:00, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
wrote:
>Hi,
>
> When analyzing code size differences between a 4.9.x compiler and
> trunk for the AVR target, I found quite a few cases where extra
> registers were being used to hold smaller types (two 8 bit registers
> for a
Hi,
When analyzing code size differences between a 4.9.x compiler and
trunk for the AVR target, I found quite a few cases where extra
registers were being used to hold smaller types (two 8 bit registers
for a uint8_t, for example).
On deeper analysis, I found that the VRP pass (gcc/tree
