> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues writes:
Ralf> I'd be grateful about feedback as to whether the general plan is
Ralf> acceptable for everyone; thanks.
Tom> Sounds good to me. Please don't forget Classpath.
Ralf> If you are talking about gcc/libjava/classpath, then yes, I have that on
Ralf> my r
Hi Tom,
* Tom Tromey wrote on Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:05:26PM CEST:
> > "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues writes:
>
> Ralf> I'd be grateful about feedback as to whether the general plan is
> Ralf> acceptable for everyone; thanks.
>
> Sounds good to me. Please don't forget Classpath.
If you are ta
> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues writes:
Ralf> I'd be grateful about feedback as to whether the general plan is
Ralf> acceptable for everyone; thanks.
Sounds good to me. Please don't forget Classpath.
Ralf> I'd prefer to do the transition on the GCC trunk rather than in a
Ralf> branch, unless t
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I haven't tried the --with-build-sysroot build; can somebody point out
> to me what I need to do for an effective test of this? I'm pretty sure
> that updating Autoconf and Automake only will not impact this feature,
> though, but I'll confirm before
Hello GCC, binutils, gdb developers,
short summary: I'd like to, in roughly that order,
1) update GCC and src to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11,
2) enable automake dependency tracking for the bfd, binutils, ld,
opcodes, gprof, and gas directories,
3) bring some more build sanity for libstdc++-v3
