> See also
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00765.html - a proposal to add
> unit tests to GCC.
Grate work! I'll also try to use this framework.
> Probably the message is wrong. Nevertheless, IIRC, the preprocessor is also
> run
> as xg++. xg++ will invoke the compiler proper (cc1p
On 10/07/2015 09:43 PM, Sabrina Souto wrote:
> I'm understanding that the major of code that I instrumented (in the
> first level of ..gcc-version-x.x/gcc/ and the dirs related to C/C++)
> is part of the 'gcc' driver. If so, this explains the great amount of
> common function calls across the tests
On 7 October 2015 at 19:43, Sabrina Souto wrote:
> I ran
> make RUNTESTFLAGS='dg.exp=c90-float-1.c -v -v' check-gcc
> And I saw in the log:
> ...
> doing compile
> Invoking the compiler as
> ../gcc-r227092/objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ -B/...
> ...
>
> The test ../testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-float-1
> OK, all that does is process some options and then call another
> executable, which does the actual compilation.
>
> To compile C code it calls cc1, to compile C++ code it calls cc1plus etc.
>
> So if you're only tracing the 'gcc' driver then you are basically only
> tracing the code for parsing
On 7 October 2015 at 16:45, Sabrina Souto wrote:
>> What exactly are you tracing, and how?
> I'm proposing an approach for testing configurable system in my
> research, and I'm trying to apply it to GCC. So, I instrumented the
> GCC function calls (in the first level of ..gcc-version-x.x/gcc/ and
On October 7, 2015 5:45:31 PM GMT+02:00, Sabrina Souto
wrote:
>> What exactly are you tracing, and how?
>I'm proposing an approach for testing configurable system in my
>research, and I'm trying to apply it to GCC. So, I instrumented the
>GCC function calls (in the first level of ..gcc-version-x.
> What exactly are you tracing, and how?
I'm proposing an approach for testing configurable system in my
research, and I'm trying to apply it to GCC. So, I instrumented the
GCC function calls (in the first level of ..gcc-version-x.x/gcc/ and
the dirs related to C/C++) and some options, in a semi-au
On 7 October 2015 at 14:57, Sabrina Souto wrote:
> I was seeing these files but I could not put the puzzle pieces
> together in my mind, and after you explained, all pieces make sense
> now. Thanks for the explanation, Jonathan.
You're doing better than I am then, noting about DejaGnu makes
comple
On 10/07/2015 07:57 AM, Sabrina Souto wrote:
I was seeing these files but I could not put the puzzle pieces
together in my mind, and after you explained, all pieces make sense
now. Thanks for the explanation, Jonathan.
The testing process is clear now, but I still not understanding what
can expla
I was seeing these files but I could not put the puzzle pieces
together in my mind, and after you explained, all pieces make sense
now. Thanks for the explanation, Jonathan.
The testing process is clear now, but I still not understanding what
can explain that amount of common functions (over 60%) a
On 7 October 2015 at 14:03, Sabrina Souto wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm needing to analyze the execution flow of a test, but don't
>>> understand how the test drivers, e.g., gcc-dg.exp or dg.exp, access
>>> the source code of GCC. When a test starts, what is the first function
>>> that is called? How can
>> Hi,
>> I'm needing to analyze the execution flow of a test, but don't
>> understand how the test drivers, e.g., gcc-dg.exp or dg.exp, access
>> the source code of GCC. When a test starts, what is the first function
>> that is called? How can I know that?
>
> The first function is main(), because
On 7 October 2015 at 12:38, Sabrina Souto wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm needing to analyze the execution flow of a test, but don't
> understand how the test drivers, e.g., gcc-dg.exp or dg.exp, access
> the source code of GCC. When a test starts, what is the first function
> that is called? How can I know tha
Hi,
I'm needing to analyze the execution flow of a test, but don't
understand how the test drivers, e.g., gcc-dg.exp or dg.exp, access
the source code of GCC. When a test starts, what is the first function
that is called? How can I know that?
On another note, I observed the execution traces of some
14 matches
Mail list logo
