> C/C++ empty arrays (int a[0]) now use a signed TYPE_DOMAIN with bounds [0,
> -1] for example (that was my original motivation to make hopefully all of
> the middle-end
> work with ssizetype TYPE_DOMAINs at least). The tree.c range-type build
> helpers accept all integral types now (but most FEs
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I'm having fun with arrays in Ada ;) and wondering if anyone can tell me
>> what's right here.
>
> No surprise, arrays are probably the base types for which there is the largest
> gap between Ada and the C family of languages, for which GCC
> I'm having fun with arrays in Ada ;) and wondering if anyone can tell me
> what's right here.
No surprise, arrays are probably the base types for which there is the largest
gap between Ada and the C family of languages, for which GCC was written.
You can see in the E_Array_Subtype case of gnat_
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having fun with arrays in Ada ;) and wondering if anyone can tell me
> what's right here.
>
> Ada ACATS c64106a contains code with an array type whose indices run from -1
> to 1. (That is, three elements.)
>
> In GCC this gets rep
Hi,
I'm having fun with arrays in Ada ;) and wondering if anyone can tell me what's
right here.
Ada ACATS c64106a contains code with an array type whose indices run from -1 to
1. (That is, three elements.)
In GCC this gets represented as an ARRAY_TYPE, whose TYPE_DOMAIN is a 32-bit
signed
