On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:42:35AM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Would anyone object to me just telling bugzilla to reject comments >
> 100k in length?
Nope. Tell the user to use the attachment feature.
> (i've chosen 100k to keep arguments about what the "right" length is. I
> believe *everyon
Dave Korn wrote:
> On 01 February 2006 05:43, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
>> I was staring at the comment database, and noticed
>
>> I can't imagine *any* of these comments are useful to human beings to
>> read.
>
> Did you browse a few? I'm curious, my guess would be that they're mostly
> huge
On 01 February 2006 05:43, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> I was staring at the comment database, and noticed
> I can't imagine *any* of these comments are useful to human beings to
> read.
Did you browse a few? I'm curious, my guess would be that they're mostly
huge rtl dumps.
> If you dump the c
I was staring at the comment database, and noticed
mysql> select COUNT(*) from longdescs where length(thetext) > 10;
+--+
| COUNT(*) |
+--+
| 271 |
+--+
1 row in set (0.48 sec)
mysql> select COUNT(*) from longdescs where length(thetext) > 50;
+--+
| CO
