Re: The reincarnation of PR15242

2009-09-09 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Andrew Haley writes: > I've been thinking about that. How would one go about writing a testcase? > I guess we're looking for a lot of jmp instrs all bracnhing to the same > label. Yeah. I would probably just wimp out and write a couple of target specific test cases. Ian

Re: The reincarnation of PR15242

2009-09-09 Thread Andrew Haley
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Andrew Haley writes: > >> This seems to be an an old bug that has come back. We're generating >> >> L1210: >> jmp *%eax >> .L4: >> .L5: >> ... >> jmp .L1210 >> .L1171: >> .L1172: >> ... >> jmp .L1210 >> .L1168: >> .L11

Re: The reincarnation of PR15242

2009-09-08 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Andrew Haley writes: > This seems to be an an old bug that has come back. We're generating > > L1210: > jmp *%eax > .L4: > .L5: > ... > jmp .L1210 > .L1171: > .L1172: > ... > jmp .L1210 > .L1168: > .L1169: > ... > jmp .L1210

The reincarnation of PR15242

2009-09-07 Thread Andrew Haley
This seems to be an an old bug that has come back. We're generating L1210: jmp *%eax .L4: .L5: ... jmp .L1210 .L1171: .L1172: ... jmp .L1210 .L1168: .L1169: ... jmp .L1210 instead of .L1210: jmp *%eax .L4: .L5: