Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/28/2009 10:47 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
We need a gcc branch for concepts.
Probably, if someone is working on them, just as for any ongoing project.
That leaves open the question of whether the ConceptGCC branch is the
one.
No. Doug felt that much of ConceptGC
On 07/28/2009 10:47 AM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
We need a gcc branch for concepts.
Probably, if someone is working on them, just as for any ongoing project.
That leaves open the question of whether the ConceptGCC branch is the
one.
No. Doug felt that much of ConceptGCC needed to be rewritt
2009/7/28 Basile STARYNKEVITCH:
>
> It could perhaps be not a branch, but a plugin, but I know not much about
> C++ concepts, and absolutely nothing about the existing C++ concepts
> branch[es].
I don't think that would work - the standard library changes that go
along with the language feature co
Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
James Dennett wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Piotr
Wyderski wrote:
Concepts have recently been removed from the C++0x Standard Draft.
Will the concepts branch be discontinued?
I hope not. Concepts will be "finished" and re-added to C++, and it
would be
James Dennett wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
Concepts have recently been removed from the C++0x Standard Draft.
Will the concepts branch be discontinued?
I hope not. Concepts will be "finished" and re-added to C++, and it
would be immensely helpful in th
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
> Concepts have recently been removed from the C++0x Standard Draft.
> Will the concepts branch be discontinued?
I hope not. Concepts will be "finished" and re-added to C++, and it
would be immensely helpful in that effort if there were a ver
Concepts have recently been removed from the C++0x Standard Draft.
Will the concepts branch be discontinued?
