Hi,
I wanted to let you know that I found the issue.
The arguments to the script that drove the simulator
had changed. Once I saw the command line that
invoked the simulator, it was trivial to fix.
Thanks for the pointer. Easy problem that was hard
to find.
--joel
On 03/23/2010 04:10 PM, Jan
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> On 03/23/2010 03:01 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Joel Sherrill
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There are a number of failures in my latest run
>>> of sparc-rtems4.10 but the ones I have gone back
>>> and
On 03/23/2010 03:01 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
Hi,
There are a number of failures in my latest run
of sparc-rtems4.10 but the ones I have gone back
and run the executable by hand actually pass.
I have no idea why this is happening and w
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are a number of failures in my latest run
> of sparc-rtems4.10 but the ones I have gone back
> and run the executable by hand actually pass.
> I have no idea why this is happening and wondered
> if someone had some insight as t
Hi,
There are a number of failures in my latest run
of sparc-rtems4.10 but the ones I have gone back
and run the executable by hand actually pass.
I have no idea why this is happening and wondered
if someone had some insight as to what I should
look at next. From gcc.log
Executing on host: /use
