Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 09:41:50AM -0800, Nathan Froyd wrote: > Patch for adding score-* and crx-* to obsolete ports below. Last > contact for SCORE and current crx maintainer CC'd. I have committed this patch. The crx maintainer (Pompapathi Gadad) contacted me via private mail and indicated it

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Douglas B Rupp wrote: > > There are four different target configuration headers used for Interix > > (i386/i386-interix.h i386/i386-interix3.h interix.h interix3.h). Since > > there's only one Interix target present in GCC, the abstraction implied by > > four headers - some o

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

Joseph S. Myers wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Douglas B Rupp wrote: Joseph S. Myers wrote: * Interix (i[34567]86-*-interix3*) (see PR 47096). I would appreciate it if you could leave Interix. I'll take the responsibility to get it working. The deprecation patch has gone in. That means that

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Douglas B Rupp wrote: > Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > > * Interix (i[34567]86-*-interix3*) (see PR 47096). > > I would appreciate it if you could leave Interix. I'll take the responsibility > to get it working. The deprecation patch has gone in. That means that your patch to

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

Joseph S. Myers wrote: * Interix (i[34567]86-*-interix3*) (see PR 47096). I would appreciate it if you could leave Interix. I'll take the responsibility to get it working.

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 08:11:07AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joseph S. Myers > wrote: > > appear to involve a simultaneously maintained set of upstream components > > that are usable together in their current upstream forms; they got Linux > > kernel support u

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I can't quite figure out what the score people are up to, but it doesn't > appear to involve a simultaneously maintained set of upstream components > that are usable together in their current upstream forms; they got Linux > kernel support

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Nathan Froyd wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 01:11:10AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send > > any other suggestions... > > score-* doesn't have a maintainer and score-elf couldn't build libgcc > last I che

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 01:11:10AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send > any other suggestions... score-* doesn't have a maintainer and score-elf couldn't build libgcc last I checked (it was also mentioned in your previous message).

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > My inclination would be to move the > > > > *-*-freebsd[12] | *-*-freebsd[12].* | *-*-freebsd*aout*) > > # This is the place-holder for the generic a.out configuration > > # of FreeBSD. No actual conf

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > My inclination would be to move the > > *-*-freebsd[12] | *-*-freebsd[12].* | *-*-freebsd*aout*) > # This is the place-holder for the generic a.out configuration > # of FreeBSD. No actual configuration resides here since > # there was only ever

Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)

On 31 January 2011 00:25, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely > wrote: >> Ah, I did look in the NetBSD cvs repository and the other arches I >> looked at just used _ANSI_H_, I obviously didn't check the ones you >> identified. >> > From a quick look, d

Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)

Hi, On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Ah, I did look in the NetBSD cvs repository and the other arches I > looked at just used _ANSI_H_, I obviously didn't check the ones you > identified. > >From a quick look, dreamcast, landisk, hpcsh, usermode and evbsh3 use fancy heade

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send > > any other suggestions, or say if you wish to volunteer to maintain one > > of these targets to avoid deprecation > > Thanks for

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send > any other suggestions, or say if you wish to volunteer to maintain one > of these targets to avoid deprecation Thanks for doing this, Joseph! I am not sure how to formally handl

Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)

On 29 January 2011 20:43, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely > wrote: >> On 28 January 2011 01:11, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> >>> * a.out NetBSD (arm*-*-netbsd* not matching arm*-*-netbsdelf*, >>> i[34567]86-*-netbsd* not matching i[34567]86-*-netbsde

Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)

On 1/29/2011 9:43 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 28 January 2011 01:11, Joseph S. Myers wrote: * a.out NetBSD (arm*-*-netbsd* not matching arm*-*-netbsdelf*, i[34567]86-*-netbsd* not matching i[34567]86-*-netbsdelf*, vax-*-netbsd* not

Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)

Hi, On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28 January 2011 01:11, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >> >> * a.out NetBSD (arm*-*-netbsd* not matching arm*-*-netbsdelf*, >> i[34567]86-*-netbsd* not matching i[34567]86-*-netbsdelf*, vax-*-netbsd* >> not matching vax-*-netbsdelf*). > > Th

Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)

On 1/28/2011 10:32 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 28 January 2011 01:11, Joseph S. Myers wrote: * a.out NetBSD (arm*-*-netbsd* not matching arm*-*-netbsdelf*, i[34567]86-*-netbsd* not matching i[34567]86-*-netbsdelf*, vax-*-netbsd* not matching vax-*-netbsdelf*). This implies some x86 targets ar

Re: NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28 January 2011 01:11, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > > > * a.out NetBSD (arm*-*-netbsd* not matching arm*-*-netbsdelf*, > > i[34567]86-*-netbsd* not matching i[34567]86-*-netbsdelf*, vax-*-netbsd* > > not matching vax-*-netbsdelf*). > > This implies s

NetBSD bootstrap (was: Target deprecations for 4.6)

On 28 January 2011 01:11, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > * a.out NetBSD (arm*-*-netbsd* not matching arm*-*-netbsdelf*, > i[34567]86-*-netbsd* not matching i[34567]86-*-netbsdelf*, vax-*-netbsd* > not matching vax-*-netbsdelf*). This implies some x86 targets are expected to work, but NetBSD-current ca

Re: Target deprecations for 4.6

On 28/01/2011 01:11, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > * i[34567]86-*-pe (an alias for Cygwin in config.gcc rather than > config.sub, so not effectively treated as an alias elsewhere). Makes sense to me, thank you. (I've never heard of anyone using it, I don't think it would even matter if you just re

Target deprecations for 4.6

There have been some discussions of possible target deprecations in 4.6, including a list I sent at , but no particular conclusions. Here is a concrete list I propose for deprecation in 4.6; please send any other suggestions, or say if y