On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:52, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> Comments? Concerns?
Only one: thanks! They all look very useful to me.
Diego.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 08:02:33PM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> > - Similarly to the work I did for s/TREE_CHAIN/DECL_CHAIN/, I'd like to
> > replace TREE_TYPE for things like {POINTER,FUNCTION,ARRAY}_TYPE, etc.
> > This work would be a good step towar
Hi,
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> - Similarly to the work I did for s/TREE_CHAIN/DECL_CHAIN/, I'd like to
> replace TREE_TYPE for things like {POINTER,FUNCTION,ARRAY}_TYPE, etc.
> This work would be a good step towards both staticizing trees and
> tuplification of types.
While
Since people are starting to post interesting patches for 4.7, I thought
it would be good to talk about bits I plan to cleanup in 4.7. Comments
on other ugly things would also be welcome.
TREE_LIST related things:
- TREE_VECTOR_CST_ELTS. I have a patch for this.
- ASM_EXPR operands, clobbers,
