Re: System header warning exemptions and delta debugging don't mix well

> > Short story: > > To make delta debugging more useful, gcc's STL system headers should > > all compile without warnings at the highest error checking level > > without the use of hardcoded warning suppressions in the compiler > > based on whether the code is in a system header or not (see >

Re: System header warning exemptions and delta debugging don't mix well

> Short story: > To make delta debugging more useful, gcc's STL system headers should > all compile without warnings at the highest error checking level > without the use of hardcoded warning suppressions in the compiler > based on whether the code is in a system header or not (see > http://g

System header warning exemptions and delta debugging don't mix well

Short story: To make delta debugging more useful, gcc's STL system headers should all compile without warnings at the highest error checking level without the use of hardcoded warning suppressions in the compiler based on whether the code is in a system header or not (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-