Re: Supporting “crippled” MIPS implementations as cpu option

2025-03-30 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote: > > Why: I have the occasional need to have gcc emit MIPS1 instructions that do > > not contain a subset of loads and stores (lwl/swl/lwr/swl instructions) > > The GCC patch to provide an option not emit lwl/lwr/swl/swr should be easily. > Somethin

Supporting “crippled” MIPS implementations as cpu option

2025-03-11 Thread mzpqnxow via Gcc
Hello, Direct questions listed at the end for the impatient :) Hopefully my mail client wraps the text properly, if not, I apologize in advance. I haven’t used this client for mailing list posts before… I’m looking for information on GCC patch submission, hoping someone can provide some guidance

Re: Supporting “crippled” MIPS implementations as cpu option

2025-03-06 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 7:14 AM mzpqnxow via Gcc wrote: > > Hello, > > Direct questions listed at the end for the impatient :) > > Hopefully my mail client wraps the text properly, if not, I apologize in > advance. I haven’t used this client for mailing list posts before… > > I’m looking for inform

Re: Supporting “crippled” MIPS implementations as cpu option

2025-03-06 Thread Gabriel Ravier via Gcc
On 3/6/25 3:07 PM, mzpqnxow via Gcc wrote: Hello, Direct questions listed at the end for the impatient :) Hopefully my mail client wraps the text properly, if not, I apologize in advance. I haven’t used this client for mailing list posts before… I’m looking for information on GCC patch submiss