Re: Subject gcc testsuite testcase gcc.c-torture/compile/20010327-1.c

2008-03-31 Thread Kai Tietz
"Andrew Pinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31.03.2008 07:13:02: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Kai Tietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This testcase seems to be broken, because it will fail everytime for the > > static variable x. gcc detects, that this static variable ha

Re: Subject gcc testsuite testcase gcc.c-torture/compile/20010327-1.c

2008-03-30 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Kai Tietz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > This testcase seems to be broken, because it will fail everytime for the > static variable x. gcc detects, that this static variable has no reference > and will produce a warning. gcc.c-torture/compile is compile

Subject gcc testsuite testcase gcc.c-torture/compile/20010327-1.c

2008-03-28 Thread Kai Tietz
Hello, This testcase seems to be broken, because it will fail everytime for the static variable x. gcc detects, that this static variable has no reference and will produce a warning. Is this done by intention, or is it a failure in testcase to set variable 'static'? Cheers, i.A. Kai Tietz |