On Sun, 2020-03-01 at 15:24 -0500, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> Greetings Jeff,
>
> Sorry if I'm bugging you.
[Dropping Jeff from CC since it appears the answer is "yes, you are"]
> I've already sent off some work on IPA passes
> with a few questions here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2020-02/msg0
On 2020-03-01 4:28 p.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 20:24, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> I'm not sure of the current status of the C++11
>> move
>
> We're in the middle of GCC 10's stage 4 and not doing anything like that now.
>
> As has been said several times, it's in scope f
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 20:24, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> I'm not sure of the current status of the C++11
> move
We're in the middle of GCC 10's stage 4 and not doing anything like that now.
As has been said several times, it's in scope for GCC 11, but not before.
Greetings Jeff,
Sorry if I'm bugging you. I've already sent off some work on IPA passes
with a few questions here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2020-02/msg00247.html
And locking SSA iterators:
From: Nicholas Krause
In order to start making SSA be muti-threaded safe I'm proposing
adding locks a
