Paolo Bonzini wrote:
The SC discussed it with Richard Stallman, and he agrees that it is not
"dangerous" (the FSF had raised objections to byte-code systems in the
past, so many of us assumed there would be a problem). So there is no
political/legal objection to including a CIL back end. If i
Joe Buck wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:06:28PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> As Joe Buck, a Steering Committee member said, you need to talk to RMS
>> directly and get him to accept the idea, before we can do anything about it.
>
> I already asked RMS directly, and he has approved. Again,
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:49:45AM +0200, Roberto COSTA wrote:
> > By the way, is there any news about the status of the CIL issue?
> > I'm sorry to bother the list readers about this, but whom could I
> > directly ask?
I wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in answering, Robert. I was out of town, and
The SC discussed it with Richard Stallman, and he agrees that it is not
"dangerous" (the FSF had raised objections to byte-code systems in the
past, so many of us assumed there would be a problem). So there is no
political/legal objection to including a CIL back end. If it passes
technical rev
Joe Buck wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:49:45AM +0200, Roberto COSTA wrote:
By the way, is there any news about the status of the CIL issue?
I'm sorry to bother the list readers about this, but whom could I
directly ask?
Sorry for the delay in answering, Robert. I was out of town, and
app
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:06:28PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> As Joe Buck, a Steering Committee member said, you need to talk to RMS
> directly and get him to accept the idea, before we can do anything about it.
I already asked RMS directly, and he has approved. Again, sorry for
the delay on g
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 11:49:45AM +0200, Roberto COSTA wrote:
> By the way, is there any news about the status of the CIL issue?
> I'm sorry to bother the list readers about this, but whom could I
> directly ask?
Sorry for the delay in answering, Robert. I was out of town, and
apparently people
Roberto COSTA wrote:
> Hello,
> last week I announced that, within the R&D division of
> STMicroelectronics I belong to, my team decided to work about a CIL
> back-end for gcc (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-06/msg00420.html).
> After receiving positive feedback and interest about such a back
Hello,
last week I announced that, within the R&D division of
STMicroelectronics I belong to, my team decided to work about a CIL
back-end for gcc (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-06/msg00420.html).
After receiving positive feedback and interest about such a back-end, I
thought it's a good i
