On 09/27/10 16:48, Paul Brook wrote:
Most of the interesting bits happen in the linker+debugger. "gcc -ffunction-
sections -fdata-sections -fPIC" is likely to be pretty good in terms of
compiler output.
What you then need is a linker that will relink an image, changing it as
little as possible
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:57:24 -0500
> If you haven't used this feature in Microsoft's Visual Studio, you can
> download Microsoft Visual Studio Express for free and see it in action.
[off-topic]
Well, I would imagine that Visual Studio Express runs only on Microsoft
Windows. Unfortunately, I don't
> Most of the interesting bits happen in the linker+debugger...
Agreed, which is why the compiler side doesn't matter much in terms of
how much it does, just so long as it is correct and compliant. This is
the hard part I'm finding, which is why I'm looking to the GCC community
which spends a gre
> A while back I posted a question about adding edit-and-continue
> abilities. Since then I've begun work on a rapid development compiler
> (rdc) which has these abilities, but I've had some thoughts I'd like to
> share, and receive some feedback from the GCC experts:
>
> What if a subset of GCC
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 07:47:48AM -0500, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> A while back I posted a question about adding edit-and-continue
> abilities.
Are you sure that is feasible? I mean, in principle, a caching
incremental compiler is probably feasible, but I cannot figure how you
could edit the sour
A while back I posted a question about adding edit-and-continue
abilities. Since then I've begun work on a rapid development compiler
(rdc) which has these abilities, but I've had some thoughts I'd like to
share, and receive some feedback from the GCC experts:
What if a subset of GCC could be use
