On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:31:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:12:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> >> Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:31:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:12:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >> Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by
> >> the links in the 'Release Series
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:12:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by
>> the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at
>> https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 03:12:22PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by
> the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at
> https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority
> (importance) of each bug? We used to hav
Is there a reason why the Serious Regressions tables, displayed by
the links in the 'Release Series and Status' section at
https://gcc.gnu.org, no longer have a column for the priority
(importance) of each bug? We used to have that and it was quite nice
to be able to click on the priority colum
