On March 29, 2018 5:14:42 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
wrote:
>> Are you suggesting we should not care about regressions with features
>> that are not enabled by default or which are only exposed with
>> "non-standard" flags? The current scheme on which bugs get P1/P2/P4+
>> assigned is quite sim
> Are you suggesting we should not care about regressions with features
> that are not enabled by default or which are only exposed with
> "non-standard" flags? The current scheme on which bugs get P1/P2/P4+
> assigned is quite simple...
I'm only suggesting keeping them at P3, which is not "don't
On 03/29/2018 04:15 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I noticed there are quite many selective scheduling PRs:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659
>>
>> and many others.
>
> Righ
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:15 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I noticed there are quite many selective scheduling PRs:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659
>>
>> and many others
> I noticed there are quite many selective scheduling PRs:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659
>
> and many others.
Right, and some of them are P1/P2, which doesn't really ma
On 21.03.2018 13:31, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 11:17 AM, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On 21.03.2018 12:48, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I noticed there are quite many selective scheduling PRs:
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872
>>> https://gc
On 03/21/2018 11:17 AM, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 21.03.2018 12:48, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
I noticed there are quite many selective scheduling PRs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
Hi Martin,
On 21.03.2018 12:48, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I noticed there are quite many selective scheduling PRs:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659
>
> and many ot
Hello.
I noticed there are quite many selective scheduling PRs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659
and many others.
I want to ask you if you plan to maintain the scheduling?
Is