Earl Chew wrote:
> Is there a recent (3.4.2 or later) patch for the following problem?
>
> Consider the short program fragment below. There are two failures, and
> one success under gcc.
>
> The entire fragment compiles ok with the latest Microsoft Visual Studio
> and even one version before th
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:30:57AM -0700, Earl Chew wrote:
> Is there a recent (3.4.2 or later) patch for the following problem?
It's not clear whether there is any problem in the compiler, though there
may be a problem in the code.
> The entire fragment compiles ok with the latest Microsoft Visu
Is there a recent (3.4.2 or later) patch for the following problem?
Consider the short program fragment below. There are two failures, and
one success under gcc.
The entire fragment compiles ok with the latest Microsoft Visual Studio
and even one version before that.
With gcc 3.4.1 (Cygwin) and
