On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 19:18 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 18:15, Luís Ferreira
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 17:59 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 17:23, Luís Ferreira
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > During my fuzzing test with l
On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 18:15, Luís Ferreira wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 17:59 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 17:23, Luís Ferreira
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > During my fuzzing test with libfuzzer I found out that GCC is not
> > > part
> > > of OSS-Fuzz project. Would b
On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 17:59 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 17:23, Luís Ferreira
> wrote:
> >
> > During my fuzzing test with libfuzzer I found out that GCC is not
> > part
> > of OSS-Fuzz project. Would be cool to discuss here a bit more about
> > fuzzing GCC codebase in
On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 17:23, Luís Ferreira wrote:
>
> During my fuzzing test with libfuzzer I found out that GCC is not part
> of OSS-Fuzz project. Would be cool to discuss here a bit more about
> fuzzing GCC codebase in order to mitigate some future vulnerabilities
> that may appear. I can volu
During my fuzzing test with libfuzzer I found out that GCC is not part
of OSS-Fuzz project. Would be cool to discuss here a bit more about
fuzzing GCC codebase in order to mitigate some future vulnerabilities
that may appear. I can volunteer myself to add the necessary steps to
fuzz GCC on the OSS
