On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 22:21 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > > That is, there won't be
> > > any problems like those mentioned in comments in bugzilla-checkout and
> > > htdocs-checkout and cgibin-checkout with the new scripts.
> >
> > I don't unde
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > That is, there won't be
> > any problems like those mentioned in comments in bugzilla-checkout and
> > htdocs-checkout and cgibin-checkout with the new scripts.
>
> I don't understand what the real problem is, because the comments claim
> something
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 21:00 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > > Date: 2005-03-01 15:26:25 -0500 (Tue, 01 Mar 2005)
>
> I take it the time will be shown in gcc.gnu.org's timezone (fixed at UTC),
> not depending on the timezone of the person making the
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Date: 2005-03-01 15:26:25 -0500 (Tue, 01 Mar 2005)
I take it the time will be shown in gcc.gnu.org's timezone (fixed at UTC),
not depending on the timezone of the person making the commit?
> > WebSVN: http://dberlin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?
> > view=
The SVN repo has been updated again.
Again, because different tags were included in this dump, you will have
to recheckout a working copy.
The only tags excluded from this run were tags with "merge" in the name,
and tags with ".*-ss-.*" and ".*_ss_.*".
For those who want http access, i can give
