Updated as of yesterday's CVS.
As always, you'll need to blow away your working copy
I haven't had time to move the hooks from dberlin.org's repo to the new
repo yet.
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
The main waiting thing at htis point is for subversion 1.2 and for
With regard to this point, will accessing the repository via SVN protocols
need 1.2 on the client, or will it only be needed on the server and if
m
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> I actually turned this off on purpose to match what we do now.
> You can tell it to suppress adds and delete diffs, we can add diff limits,
> etc.
> Unlike our current ad-hoc scripts, mailer.py is very easy to modify.
I think matching what we do now is q
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> The main waiting thing at htis point is for subversion 1.2 and for
With regard to this point, will accessing the repository via SVN protocols
need 1.2 on the client, or will it only be needed on the server and if
mirroring the repository?
--
Joseph S
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
mailer.conf needs a bit more configuration to get all the right messages
to the right mailing lists, but that's trivial.
(And to ensure that the messages have the right sender address, i.e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (not @
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> mailer.conf needs a bit more configuration to get all the right messages
> to the right mailing lists, but that's trivial.
(And to ensure that the messages have the right sender address, i.e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (not @sourceware.org).)
I notice the facil
On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 18:53 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > I have no clue how the savannah mirroring works now, or who to contact.
> > Pointers would be appreciated.
> >
> > If they mirror via rsync, they just need to change the directory they
> > m
On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 18:34 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > I have converted most all of our scripts at this point, and verified
> > they work trivially (IE that changing something in www makes it update
> > the www dir)
>
> Could the current patches
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> I have no clue how the savannah mirroring works now, or who to contact.
> Pointers would be appreciated.
>
> If they mirror via rsync, they just need to change the directory they
> mirror from.
> If they mirror via some other method, we'll need to replac
On Sun, 2005-03-06 at 18:34 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > I have converted most all of our scripts at this point, and verified
> > they work trivially (IE that changing something in www makes it update
> > the www dir)
>
> Could the current patches
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> I have converted most all of our scripts at this point, and verified
> they work trivially (IE that changing something in www makes it update
> the www dir)
Could the current patches to the scripts in contrib/ and
maintainer-scripts/, wwwdocs/bin if don
Due to some massive speedups i've implemented in cvs2svn, the full gcc
repo, including all non-broken tags (more in a moment), is now
available. It would have taken ~7 days before, and now it takes less
than 2 (it's almost completely disk bound now, and my 7200rpm disks just
aren't fast enough app
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 22:21 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > > That is, there won't be
> > > any problems like those mentioned in comments in bugzilla-checkout and
> > > htdocs-checkout and cgibin-checkout with the new scripts.
> >
> > I don't unde
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > That is, there won't be
> > any problems like those mentioned in comments in bugzilla-checkout and
> > htdocs-checkout and cgibin-checkout with the new scripts.
>
> I don't understand what the real problem is, because the comments claim
> something
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 21:00 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> > > Date: 2005-03-01 15:26:25 -0500 (Tue, 01 Mar 2005)
>
> I take it the time will be shown in gcc.gnu.org's timezone (fixed at UTC),
> not depending on the timezone of the person making the
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > Date: 2005-03-01 15:26:25 -0500 (Tue, 01 Mar 2005)
I take it the time will be shown in gcc.gnu.org's timezone (fixed at UTC),
not depending on the timezone of the person making the commit?
> > WebSVN: http://dberlin.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?
> > view=
The SVN repo has been updated again.
Again, because different tags were included in this dump, you will have
to recheckout a working copy.
The only tags excluded from this run were tags with "merge" in the name,
and tags with ".*-ss-.*" and ".*_ss_.*".
For those who want http access, i can give
17 matches
Mail list logo
