Re: SSA Iterators

2020-01-30 Thread Nicholas Krause
, adding yet another one doesn't help. Which is why I was trying to tackle the more difficult one(s) first. Most of the iterators should be trivial to convert to whatever style we settle on. Richard. Richard, I do recall there was some agreement on moving to C++11 last year so for each l

Re: SSA Iterators

2020-01-30 Thread Richard Biener
On January 30, 2020 5:05:09 PM GMT+01:00, Martin Sebor wrote: >On 1/30/20 2:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, 05:44 Nicholas Krause wrote: >>> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I was looking into starting to cleaning up the SSA trees for various >>> reasons and iterators >>> seem to be th

Re: SSA Iterators

2020-01-30 Thread Martin Sebor
On 1/30/20 2:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, 05:44 Nicholas Krause wrote: Greetings, I was looking into starting to cleaning up the SSA trees for various reasons and iterators seem to be the easiest to do. I searched the list to see if someone mentioned it before and I ran a

Re: SSA Iterators

2020-01-30 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, 05:44 Nicholas Krause wrote: > > Greetings, > > I was looking into starting to cleaning up the SSA trees for various > reasons and iterators > seem to be the easiest to do. I searched the list to see if someone > mentioned it before > and I ran across this: > https://gcc.gnu.or

SSA Iterators

2020-01-29 Thread Nicholas Krause
Greetings, I was looking into starting to cleaning up the SSA trees for various reasons and iterators seem to be the easiest to do. I searched the list to see if someone mentioned it before and I ran across this: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg02031.html If your trying to get a