On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:02:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> It would need to be done before graphite, and yes, the question is when
>> to do this (given the non-trival text size and runtime cost). One option is
>> to do sth similar lik
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:02:38AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> It would need to be done before graphite, and yes, the question is when
> to do this (given the non-trival text size and runtime cost). One option is
> to do sth similar like we do with IFN_LOOP_VECTORIZED, that is, after
> followup
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 14:45 +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I was looking at the spec 456.hmmer benchmark and this email string
>> > from Jeff Law and Micheal Matz:
>> >
>> >
On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 14:45 +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> >
> > I was looking at the spec 456.hmmer benchmark and this email string
> > from Jeff Law and Micheal Matz:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01970.html
> >
Hi Steve,
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I was looking at the spec 456.hmmer benchmark and this email string
> from Jeff Law and Micheal Matz:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01970.html
>
> and was wondering if anyone was looking at what more it would take
> for G
I was looking at the spec 456.hmmer benchmark and this email string
from Jeff Law and Micheal Matz:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01970.html
and was wondering if anyone was looking at what more it would take
for GCC to vectorize the loop in P7Viterbi. There is a big performanc
