Yury Gribov writes:
>[...]
>> [mudflap] never reached a point where interoperability across objects with
> and without mudflap instrumentation worked
>
> Could you add more details? E.g. I don't see how mudflap
> interoperability is different from AdressSanitizer which seems to be
> state of the
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:54:31AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/05/13 03:11, Yury Gribov wrote:
> > > If you're referring to mudflap (Frank Eigler's work),
> > > ...
> > > It never reached a point where interoperability across objects with
> >and without mudflap instrumentation worked
> >Could y
On 11/05/13 03:11, Yury Gribov wrote:
> If you're referring to mudflap (Frank Eigler's work),
> ...
> It never reached a point where interoperability across objects with
and without mudflap instrumentation worked
Jeff,
Could you add more details? E.g. I don't see how mudflap
interoperability
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:55:21AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/05/13 03:35, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >On 11/04/2013 05:43 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> >>On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >>>You might also be referring to Greg McGary's work on bounded
> >>>pointers, I don't
> >>>think tha
On 11/05/13 03:35, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 11/04/2013 05:43 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
You might also be referring to Greg McGary's work on bounded
pointers, I don't
think that ever got integrated or if it did, it got pulled long ago.
It was integrated in
On 11/04/2013 05:43 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
You might also be referring to Greg McGary's work on bounded pointers, I don't
think that ever got integrated or if it did, it got pulled long ago.
It was integrated in 2000, removed in 2002/2003 (I removed the
> If you're referring to mudflap (Frank Eigler's work),
> ...
> It never reached a point where interoperability across objects with
and without mudflap instrumentation worked
Jeff,
Could you add more details? E.g. I don't see how mudflap
interoperability is different from AdressSanitizer whic
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Jeff Law wrote:
> You might also be referring to Greg McGary's work on bounded pointers, I don't
> think that ever got integrated or if it did, it got pulled long ago.
It was integrated in 2000, removed in 2002/2003 (I removed the relics from
glibc earlier this year). By usi
On 11/04/13 03:44, Florian Weimer wrote:
More than a decade ago, there was some work in GCC and glibc about
propagating bounds information for pointers. I could find the old web
page on archive.org, but I'm wondering if there's a concise report how
it actually worked and how much software could
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:44:57AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> More than a decade ago, there was some work in GCC and glibc about
> propagating bounds information for pointers. I could find the old
> web page on archive.org, but I'm wondering if there's a concise
> report how it actually worked
More than a decade ago, there was some work in GCC and glibc about
propagating bounds information for pointers. I could find the old web
page on archive.org, but I'm wondering if there's a concise report how
it actually worked and how much software could be ported over with what
amount of effo
11 matches
Mail list logo
