Hendrik Greving wrote:
> Yes :) I am asking about 3.2.3 but I think the reload concepts should
> be about the same. From what I can tell, most of the code I looked at
> was almost identical to GCC 4.7.3.
Yes, but it was completely rewritten for GCC 4.8 :-)
See e.g. the following email (and the t
Yes :) I am asking about 3.2.3 but I think the reload concepts should
be about the same. From what I can tell, most of the code I looked at
was almost identical to GCC 4.7.3.
Yes, the instruction 2219 is a paradoxical subreg. There is a little
bit more to the story than I had outlined, let me try
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Hendrik Greving
wrote:
> I am looking at a case (old GCC 3.2.3 is used), which I like to
> outline as follow:
Are you really asking about GCC 3.2.3, released over 10 years ago?
> (insn 2219 2218 2220 (nil) (set (reg:SI 1296)
> (plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg/v:H
I am looking at a case (old GCC 3.2.3 is used), which I like to
outline as follow:
00.rtl:
(insn 2219 2218 2220 (nil) (set (reg:SI 1296)
(plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg/v:HI 1277) 0)
(const_int 1 [0x1]))) -1 (nil)
(nil))
(insn 2220 2219 2221 (nil) (set (reg/v:HI 1277)
