Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking

2007-04-13 Thread Vladimir N. Makarov
Steven Bosscher wrote: On 4/12/07, Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An interesting observation is that the more hard registers the processor > has, the bigger slowdown is. Although it might be a coincidence. Yes, I noticed

Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking

2007-04-12 Thread Steven Bosscher
On 4/12/07, Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An interesting observation is that the more hard registers the processor > has, the bigger slowdown is. Although it might be a coincidence. Yes, I noticed this too. I don't believe

Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking

2007-04-12 Thread Steven Bosscher
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: An interesting observation is that the more hard registers the processor has, the bigger slowdown is. Although it might be a coincidence. Yes, I noticed this too. I don't believe this is a coincidence. It's the first thing I was plannin

Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking

2007-04-12 Thread Vladimir Makarov
Steven Bosscher wrote: On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for testing this. Do you also have per benchmark compilation > times, perhaps? > Not really. I don't do that because runtest startup is about 0.4s (on ppc64) and a few fp tests are compiled for 1.5s. If y

Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking

2007-04-12 Thread Steven Bosscher
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for testing this. Do you also have per benchmark compilation > times, perhaps? > Not really. I don't do that because runtest startup is about 0.4s (on ppc64) and a few fp tests are compiled for 1.5s. If you are interesting in anal

Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking

2007-04-12 Thread Vladimir Makarov
Steven Bosscher wrote: On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: SPECFp2000 compilation time (user time): machine mainline branch change - x86_64 104.8s117.7s +12.3% ppc64312.3s367.8s +17.8% ia64 377.6s502.9s +33.2% Hi

Re: Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking

2007-04-11 Thread Steven Bosscher
On 4/12/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: SPECFp2000 compilation time (user time): machine mainline branch change - x86_64 104.8s117.7s +12.3% ppc64312.3s367.8s +17.8% ia64 377.6s502.9s +33.2% Hi Vlad, Thanks for testing

Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking

2007-04-11 Thread Vladimir Makarov
DF made a big progress especially with recent Ken Zadeck's DCE/DSE improvements. I think dataflow benchmarking will be interesting to people. Here is the comparison of dataflow-branch as of Apr 7. with the mainline on the last merge point (r123656) done by Daniel Berlin on Apr 7. Compilers f