Hi,
Thanks a lot for your time and replies.. It worked. Im sorry it was a
silly mistake that I dint notice.
Aravinda
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Laurynas Biveinis
wrote:
>> static GTY(( is_param(union tree_code) )) htab_t boud_ins = NULL;
>
> Ah, now it's clear. You probably wanted "union t
> static GTY(( is_param(union tree_code) )) htab_t boud_ins = NULL;
Ah, now it's clear. You probably wanted "union tree_node" with n, not c, here.
--
Laurynas
Hi,
Thanks a lot for the reply. No, I am not using any specific tree_code
definitions and I have included tree.h in the pass file.
I dont know if some code will help, but, this is what I am doing
gcc-svn/gcc/tree-boud.c
...
static GTY(( is_param(union tree_code) )) htab_t boud_ins = NULL;
...
#inc
Hi,
It's hard to tell. The normal definition of tree_code is enum in
tree.h and it is an atomic type with respect GCC garbage collection.
But the names like gt_gcc_mx_tree_code suggest that GCC internals try
to treat it as a struct or some other non atomic type. Any chance
that your source does n
