On Wednesday 21 October 2009 02:58:42 Ireneusz Szpilewski wrote:
> Current status of void is somewhat strange. It is a type but you cannot
> create objects of type void.
> So, it is type of what? But you can have memory pointer to void, so
> object (or array) of type void
> has its memory position
Ireneusz Szpilewski writes:
> I have 2 ideas about C++ language, maybe they could be implemented as
> GCC C++ extensions (Microsoft has many his own and no one
> complains). :-)
We generally do not want to implement language extensions. It takes a
strong argument to convince us. Also, as a pra
