> > I figured
> > it'd be better than doing GS_SEQP_FIRST(&non_pointer), but I can if you
> > prefer.
>
> I think I would, though without the "P".
Ok, everything fixed, except I haven't added the sequence iterators yet.
I am committing the patch below to the gimple-tuples-branch.
Thanks again.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:30:40PM -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> I figured
> it'd be better than doing GS_SEQP_FIRST(&non_pointer), but I can if you
> prefer.
I think I would, though without the "P".
r~
> > +/* A sequences of gimple statements. */
> > +#define GS_SEQP_FIRST(S) (S)->first
> > +#define GS_SEQP_LAST(S)(S)->last
> > +#define GS_SEQ_FIRST(S)(S).first
> > +#define GS_SEQ_LAST(S) (S).last
>
> Why do you have both of these?
Most places in the gimpl
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:07:14PM -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> + /* There can be 3 types of unary operations:
> +
> + SYM =<== GSS_ASSIGN_UNARY_REG
> + SYM = SYM2 <== GSS_ASSIGN_UNARY_MEM
Um, ssa_name = ssa_name isn't a memory
> +/* A seq
