> Remainders, in reverse chronological order:
Thanks Ralf. I'm CCing the people.
Paolo
> 2010-05-05 Sebastian Pop
>
> * configure.ac: Allow all the versions greater than 0.10 of PPL.
> * configure: Regenerated.
>
>
> 2010-04-16 Rainer Orth
>
> * configure.ac: Check for el
* Dave Korn wrote on Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:36:26AM CEST:
> >>> bcd70fb06d56d9316d49019f5c0a3109def08d39 158763
> >>> a9ed67d000f285282e61aa9b87cc8d992a8731df 158762
> >> 17281d1ee17f204064cfcbcc82089aefa19e3779 159527
> >> 401f30d69e280e18a9581b819376d18786595d3b 159173
> I've synched
On 26/05/2010 06:09, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 26/05/2010 05:58, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 25/05/2010 18:33, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>>
>>> bcd70fb06d56d9316d49019f5c0a3109def08d39 158763
>>> a9ed67d000f285282e61aa9b87cc8d992a8731df 158762
>> I'm responsible for those two, and I'm copying them across
On 26/05/2010 05:58, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 25/05/2010 18:33, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
>> bcd70fb06d56d9316d49019f5c0a3109def08d39 158763
>> a9ed67d000f285282e61aa9b87cc8d992a8731df 158762
>
> I'm responsible for those two, and I'm copying them across right now; sorry
> for forgetting.
An
On 25/05/2010 18:33, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> bcd70fb06d56d9316d49019f5c0a3109def08d39 158763
> a9ed67d000f285282e61aa9b87cc8d992a8731df 158762
I'm responsible for those two, and I'm copying them across right now; sorry
for forgetting.
cheers,
DaveK
On 25/05/2010 17:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't have much time to devote to bringing the trees
> back in shape, and not even to chase down committers of patches placed
> only on one side. Can anybody help with this?
Augh. I forgot to copy over this one:
> PR lto/427
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:38 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> Also, I would like to make a new policy that from now on patches to
>> the toplevel cannot be committed by anyone who doesn't have write
>> access to both gcc and src. Is there any agreement on this?
>
> Our current policy certainly doesn't
> There are no changes in intl, libiberty. The sourceware git mirror
> doesn't seem to carry libdecnumber. Which files in include/ were
> part of libiberty again?
Libiberty is kept in sync because gcc is the master and src is the
copy, so it can be mostly automated. The libiberty sync includes
> Also, I would like to make a new policy that from now on patches to
> the toplevel cannot be committed by anyone who doesn't have write
> access to both gcc and src. Is there any agreement on this?
Our current policy certainly doesn't work, either we come up with
something that will, or abando
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:33:53PM CEST:
> * Paolo Bonzini wrote on Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:10:33PM CEST:
> > As you prefer. I'd rather see a list of commits before giving you
> > green light though. :-)
>
> commit id of infradead mirror, GCC SVN revision number:
One more
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:10:33PM CEST:
> On 05/25/2010 07:09 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>... the last date when the tree was synchronized ...
> >
> >It looked fairly good 3 months ago[1].
Toplevel and config/ went out of sync with commit 6c8aa2aa884d of the
GCC infradead
On 05/25/2010 07:09 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:06:16PM CEST:
the toplevel configury of gcc/gdb/binutils is very much out of sync.
Unfortunately I don't have much time to devote to bringing the trees
back in shape, and not even to chase down com
* Paolo Bonzini wrote on Tue, May 25, 2010 at 06:06:16PM CEST:
> the toplevel configury of gcc/gdb/binutils is very much out of sync.
> Unfortunately I don't have much time to devote to bringing the trees
> back in shape, and not even to chase down committers of patches
> placed only on one side.
13 matches
Mail list logo
