Re: testsuite question

2017-11-03 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 12:41:30PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/03/2017 12:34 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > One of the tests for gfortran has been XPASSing > > on newer versions of FreeBSD. The testcase has > > the line > > > > ! { dg-xfail-if "" { "*-*-freebsd*" } { "*" } { "" } } > > > > I kno

Re: testsuite question

2017-11-03 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/03/2017 12:34 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: One of the tests for gfortran has been XPASSing on newer versions of FreeBSD. The testcase has the line ! { dg-xfail-if "" { "*-*-freebsd*" } { "*" } { "" } } I know the tests passes on *-*-freebsd12.0. I should pass on *-*-freebsd11.* and perhaps *

Re: testsuite question

2011-02-22 Thread Richard Guenther
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Christian Grössler wrote: > On 19.02.11 23:01, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Christian Grössler >>  wrote: >>> >>> The failures come from the assembler which complains about the out of >>> range >>> shift counts. >>> >>> Should I

Re: testsuite question

2011-02-21 Thread Christian Grössler
On 19.02.11 23:01, Richard Guenther wrote: On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Christian Grössler wrote: The failures come from the assembler which complains about the out of range shift counts. Should I disable them or is there any reason unknown to me that these tests make sense? You need

Re: testsuite question

2011-02-19 Thread Richard Guenther
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Christian Grössler wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running the testsuite with a compiler for a private target. > > I get many failures because of shift counts out of range (too big or > negative). > > Examples of failed tests: > > gcc.c-torture/compile/20020710-1.c > gcc.c-t