Re: subreg transformation causes incorrect post_inc

2006-11-12 Thread Mark Shinwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Mark Shinwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My port, based on (GCC) 4.2.0 20061002 (experimental), is producing incorrect code for the following test case: [snip] I've only had a very quick look at your code, but I have a feeling thatthis is an i

Re: subreg transformation causes incorrect post_inc

2006-11-10 Thread TabonyEE
From: Mark Shinwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My port, based on (GCC) 4.2.0 20061002 (experimental), is producing > > incorrect code for the following test case: > [snip] > > I've only had a very quick look at your code, but I have a feeling > thatthis is an instance of t

Re: subreg transformation causes incorrect post_inc

2006-11-10 Thread TabonyEE
From: Mark Shinwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My port, based on (GCC) 4.2.0 20061002 (experimental), is producing > > incorrect code for the following test case: > [snip] > > I've only had a very quick look at your code, but I have a feeling > thatthis is an instance of t

Re: subreg transformation causes incorrect post_inc

2006-11-10 Thread Mark Shinwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My port, based on (GCC) 4.2.0 20061002 (experimental), is producing incorrect code for the following test case: [snip] I've only had a very quick look at your code, but I have a feeling that this is an instance of the kind of slip-up with GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS th