Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > It would seem to me that if everything was moved to libada, this
> > would not be necessary anymore.
> Sorry, I wanted to write "everything related to the Ada RTS".
Oh, I see.
> Of course Gigi is not going to be moved into libada.
Right :-)
And even if "everything r
>> It would seem to me that if everything was moved to libada, this
>> would not be necessary anymore.
>
> Besides our move to svn, a primary goal of the suggested change
> is to move this set of sources out of a more general grabbag, to
> clarify their specific purpose and simplify the grabba
Hello Paolo,
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Would it be possible to add a --enable-small option to libada, which
> would enable compilation of the subset used by GNAT? Then, one could
> make libada build twice: as a host module with --enable-small, and as a
> target module without the option.
Humm,
A number of these sources are indeed shared (some compiler sources
are used by the library and/or some tools) and moving them is not
straightforward.
Would it be possible to add a --enable-small option to libada, which
would enable compilation of the subset used by GNAT? Then, one could
Hello Joseph,
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> If moving files, I'd encourage moving the sources built from the libada/
> and gnattools/ toplevel directories to be physically located in those
> directories (or subdirectories of them) as far as possible, as one step in
> the rearrangement.
> I don't ho
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> As part of our Ada front-end maintainership, we (AdaCore) would like
> to introduce a subdirectory of 'ada' where we would relocate all the
> files implementing the Ada-front-end/GCC interface (the "gigi" sources
> for the internal GNAT/GCC tree interfa
