IainS writes:
> On 28 Sep 2010, at 17:29, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> Jack Howarth writes:
>>
>>> Does the new split stack feature in gcc trunk absolutely require
>>> additional
>>> libc support to function or can it be made to work on other targets
>>> like
>>> darwin with just changes to lib
On 28 Sep 2010, at 17:29, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Jack Howarth writes:
Does the new split stack feature in gcc trunk absolutely require
additional
libc support to function or can it be made to work on other targets
like
darwin with just changes to libgcc? Thanks in advance for any
clari
Jack Howarth writes:
> Does the new split stack feature in gcc trunk absolutely require additional
> libc support to function or can it be made to work on other targets like
> darwin with just changes to libgcc? Thanks in advance for any
> clarifications.
The additional support that it needs i
